Slumming is a peculiar phenomenon - people work hard to improve their lives economically and socially, yet once established, some work just as hard to find and frequent the type of places that they endeavored so desperately to leave behind.
Or so it appears. There is a cache to slumming. The act of dumbing down ones choices for eating and playing, somehow confers authenticity and coolness. But I think what is actually happening is that this type of activity is limited to areas where others of like mind and age have settled. How many actually want to live among the poor, isolatedin a neighborhood with none oftheir peers? There are some, of course, who did move into uncharted territory and paved the way for others. I have always admired the spirit of these early pioneers.
In fact, it is debatable whether there can be any real slumming in Manhattan - virtually every neighborhood is fully gentrified, partially gentrified or populated by some variant of the downtown hipster. There are few neighborhoods left which are strictly the domain of the common, working class man or woman.
In the final analysis, a person of means can never really experience the life of the poor or the common man. If nothing else, knowing that one has options and is only a tourist in a disadvantaged world makes all the difference.
I was surprised to learn that slumming dates back to the late 1800s. According to a recent fascinating New York Times article, When Slumming Was the Thing to Do, the practice started in London and had versions in urban America, centered in Chicago and New York City.
Read the rest of this entry »